Post by SHI on Feb 22, 2013 17:38:42 GMT -5
If you activate a sword skill to attack a mob and your party member is too close, wouldn't both get hit: the mob via your intentional attack and your party member via unintentional friendly fire.
Logically speaking if your party member is holding the target still and you run the target through with your sword and the target is thin enough, you should hit your party member.
Or if you using something like my slash triangle that attacks the target from 3 different and someone is holding the kobold, they should get hit by one of the strikes simply because they will be in the direct path of one of the attacks:
Badly Drawn Picture of the situation.
Am I right on this? Because this was the reason why switches were developed.
Logically speaking if your party member is holding the target still and you run the target through with your sword and the target is thin enough, you should hit your party member.
Or if you using something like my slash triangle that attacks the target from 3 different and someone is holding the kobold, they should get hit by one of the strikes simply because they will be in the direct path of one of the attacks:
Badly Drawn Picture of the situation.
Am I right on this? Because this was the reason why switches were developed.
![AMBROSIA](http://i.imgur.com/d6gQ5fp.png")
